Rules compared
| Rule | MyFundedFutures | Bulenox |
|---|---|---|
| Market | Futures | Futures |
| Phases | One-phase | One-phase |
| Eval cost (mid tier) | $80 | $105 |
| Profit target | 6% | 6% |
| Max drawdown | Trailing (EOD) · 4% | Trailing (EOD) · 5% |
| Daily loss limit | None | None |
| Consistency rule | None | 30% |
| Min trading days | 1 | 1 |
| Max days | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Profit split | 90% | 90% |
| Payout buffer | 3% | 5% |
| Trailing on funded | No | No |
| Payout frequency | Every 14 days | Every 14 days |
Simulated outcomes, same trader
Identical balanced archetype (50% win rate, 1.2R average winner, 3 trades a day), 10,000 simulated evaluations against each firm's exact ruleset.
| Metric | MyFundedFutures | Bulenox |
|---|---|---|
| Pass rate | 58.5% | 58.6% |
| Payout rate (if passed) | 39.9% | 32.0% |
| Joint withdrawal probability | 23.3% | 18.7% |
| Expected P&L over 50 challenges | $29.9k | $40k |
| Failures from drawdown breach | 58% | 53% |
| Failures from daily loss | 0% | 0% |
Which should you pick?
MyFundedFutures: MFFU's Starter plan is one of the highest theoretical pass rates in futures — one phase, static-until-lock drawdown, no daily loss on some plans. Payouts require a small profit buffer and a handful of trading days. Attractive for high-frequency scalpers; less kind to swing traders who take one big loser.
Bulenox: Bulenox runs Apex-like rules at aggressive promo prices — the reason many high-volume traders test strategies here first. Trailing drawdown is the killer; passing is one thing, but stacking payouts on the funded side is where most traders leak edge.
On the numbers above, MyFundedFutures is the better expected-value choice for a balanced profile — but archetypes are not you. A scalper and a swing trader can flip this ranking entirely, because drawdown type punishes lumpy P&L far more than frequent small P&L. Run your own drawdown numbers first, then simulate your real stats.
Frequently asked
Is MyFundedFutures or Bulenox easier to pass?+
In our simulation of a balanced 50%-win-rate trader, MyFundedFutures passes 58.5% of the time and Bulenox passes 58.6% — so Bulenox is the easier evaluation for that profile. The gap is driven mostly by drawdown type (Trailing (EOD) vs Trailing (EOD)) and the number of phases.
Which is cheaper, MyFundedFutures or Bulenox?+
The mid-tier evaluation costs $80 at MyFundedFutures and $105 at Bulenox. Sticker price is the wrong comparison though: over 50 attempted challenges our simulation nets $29.9k at MyFundedFutures versus $40k at Bulenox, because a cheaper eval you fail more often is not cheaper.
Which pays out more reliably, MyFundedFutures or Bulenox?+
Conditional on passing, our model gives MyFundedFutures a 39.9% chance of reaching a first payout versus 32.0% at Bulenox. End to end — pass and withdraw — that is 23.3% vs 18.7%. Profit splits are 90% and 90%.
What is the biggest rule difference between MyFundedFutures and Bulenox?+
MyFundedFutures uses a trailing (eod) drawdown of 4% with no daily loss limit; Bulenox uses a trailing (eod) drawdown of 5% with no daily loss limit. MyFundedFutures is the stricter ruleset for most trading styles.
Compare both firms using YOUR trading stats
Log your trades in the journal, push your real win rate and R-multiple into the simulator, and see which of these two rulesets you actually clear.
Run my simulationMore MyFundedFutures comparisons
Based on publicly listed rules as of 2026-07-15. Independent — not affiliated with MyFundedFutures or Bulenox. Rules change; verify before paying. Simulations are estimates, not guarantees.