Rules compared
| Rule | MyFundedFutures | Take Profit Trader |
|---|---|---|
| Market | Futures | Futures |
| Phases | One-phase | One-phase |
| Eval cost (mid tier) | $80 | $150 |
| Profit target | 6% | 6% |
| Max drawdown | Trailing (EOD) · 4% | Static · 3% |
| Daily loss limit | None | None |
| Consistency rule | None | None |
| Min trading days | 1 | 5 |
| Max days | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Profit split | 90% | 80% |
| Payout buffer | 3% | 3% |
| Trailing on funded | No | No |
| Payout frequency | Every 14 days | Every 7 days |
Simulated outcomes, same trader
Identical balanced archetype (50% win rate, 1.2R average winner, 3 trades a day), 10,000 simulated evaluations against each firm's exact ruleset.
| Metric | MyFundedFutures | Take Profit Trader |
|---|---|---|
| Pass rate | 58.5% | 58.4% |
| Payout rate (if passed) | 39.9% | 38.3% |
| Joint withdrawal probability | 23.3% | 22.4% |
| Expected P&L over 50 challenges | $29.9k | $17k |
| Failures from drawdown breach | 58% | 46% |
| Failures from daily loss | 0% | 0% |
Which should you pick?
MyFundedFutures: MFFU's Starter plan is one of the highest theoretical pass rates in futures — one phase, static-until-lock drawdown, no daily loss on some plans. Payouts require a small profit buffer and a handful of trading days. Attractive for high-frequency scalpers; less kind to swing traders who take one big loser.
Take Profit Trader: TPT is one of the friendlier eval structures — static drawdown, no daily loss on core plans, generous max days. Simulated pass rates run high across archetypes. Where it costs you is the profit split and payout cadence versus more aggressive competitors.
On the numbers above, MyFundedFutures is the better expected-value choice for a balanced profile — but archetypes are not you. A scalper and a swing trader can flip this ranking entirely, because drawdown type punishes lumpy P&L far more than frequent small P&L. Run your own drawdown numbers first, then simulate your real stats.
Frequently asked
Is MyFundedFutures or Take Profit Trader easier to pass?+
In our simulation of a balanced 50%-win-rate trader, MyFundedFutures passes 58.5% of the time and Take Profit Trader passes 58.4% — so MyFundedFutures is the easier evaluation for that profile. The gap is driven mostly by drawdown type (Trailing (EOD) vs Static) and the number of phases.
Which is cheaper, MyFundedFutures or Take Profit Trader?+
The mid-tier evaluation costs $80 at MyFundedFutures and $150 at Take Profit Trader. Sticker price is the wrong comparison though: over 50 attempted challenges our simulation nets $29.9k at MyFundedFutures versus $17k at Take Profit Trader, because a cheaper eval you fail more often is not cheaper.
Which pays out more reliably, MyFundedFutures or Take Profit Trader?+
Conditional on passing, our model gives MyFundedFutures a 39.9% chance of reaching a first payout versus 38.3% at Take Profit Trader. End to end — pass and withdraw — that is 23.3% vs 22.4%. Profit splits are 90% and 80%.
What is the biggest rule difference between MyFundedFutures and Take Profit Trader?+
MyFundedFutures uses a trailing (eod) drawdown of 4% with no daily loss limit; Take Profit Trader uses a static drawdown of 3% with no daily loss limit. Take Profit Trader is the stricter ruleset for most trading styles.
Compare both firms using YOUR trading stats
Log your trades in the journal, push your real win rate and R-multiple into the simulator, and see which of these two rulesets you actually clear.
Run my simulationMore MyFundedFutures comparisons
Based on publicly listed rules as of 2026-07-15. Independent — not affiliated with MyFundedFutures or Take Profit Trader. Rules change; verify before paying. Simulations are estimates, not guarantees.